Review: Much Ado About Nothing

One of the greatest things about William Shakespeare’s plays is how eminently adaptable they are. They have so many layers and are so timeless that they seamlessly move through eras allowing for stagings in an almost endless variety. Which, while not always successful, does bring these wonderful plays to new and disparate places culturally.

Whedon's explanation of this shot is amazing

Whedon’s explanation of this shot is amazing

Geek media royalty, Joss Whedon is our adapter this time as he brought all of his actor friends to his home (which serves as the set and is GORGEOUS) and filmed this modern retelling of Shakespeare’s ode to the love that hides under hate. The black and white photography and the use of The Bard’s words are the only “throw back” elements while everything else is thoroughly modern day.

Having seen many adaptations of Shakespeare in the past, locking into the speech wasn’t so difficult, although the obvious modern setting surrounding this very specific type of dialogue does make you feel like everyone suffered some sort of group head injury for a second. “Why are they speaking like that while holding iPhones?” your brain rightly screams. But, slowly that cognitive disconnect subsides and you’re overwhelmed in capital “A” Acting!

Look, subtlety thy name was hardly Shakespeare so seeing actors give it their all is perfect for the mood but it does veer into the over the top area at times. Nathan Fillion’s “Dogberry” for example is a broadly comic character that Fillion makes ever broader than usual (His on screen partner, Tom Lenk’s “Verges” is similarly over the top but from an actor like Lenk it comes off as less goofy). While Sean Maher’s “Don John”, our villain, slithers just this side of cartoon villainy as he plans his eeeeeeevil misdeeds with his cohorts Borachio and Conrade (Spencer Treat Clark and comedienne Riki Lindhome in the traditionally male role, here also Don John’s lover(!))

The true stars of the piece though are Amy Acker and Alexis Denisof’s “Beatrice” and “Benedick” the sharp tongued and sarcastic hearts of the story. Acker and Denisof have undeniable chemistry, as any fan of Whedon’s Angel– where they starred as star-crossed lovers Wesley and Fred- well know. This film however begs the question of why is Acker not a bigger star? Her Beatrice is basically amazing and is by a large margin simply the best thing about this movie. In a film full of great, perhaps star making, performances (particularly Fran Kranz’s “Claudio” who transcends his Dollhouse IT nerd “Topher” and lands in the neighborhood of romantic lead and Clark Gregg, who with this, Marvel’s The Avengers, and the upcoming TV series Agents of S.H.E.I.L.D. is quickly becoming Whedon’s spirit animal) my hope is that Acker gets the most momentum following this project and becomes a household name as she deserves.

Shakespeare is really easy to mess up. Too much emphasis on style versus substance (paging Baz Luhrman!) can tip the story into a farcical mess. Whedon has crafted a perfectly balanced modern retelling of Much Ado about Nothing that feels as easy as his previous work. Despite the adherence to the classical language it’s accessible and fun. It helps that nearly every actor in it has worked with Whedon in some capacity on a previous project and therefore has an easy rapport with not only him but each other. This is one of the rare cross genre films that has the potential to make new fans of both Shakespeare and Whedon while simultaneously being a a love letter from a fan to one of his more obvious inspirations. A-


One Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s